What Does derive coulomb's as a special case of guass law Mean?
What Does derive coulomb's as a special case of guass law Mean?
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Law professors traditionally have played a much lesser role in acquiring case legislation in common regulation than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[four] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much of the exposition of your regulation in civil law traditions is done by lecturers rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals such as Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common law courts relied very little on legal scholarship; Therefore, for the turn in the twentieth century, it was pretty unusual to find out a tutorial writer quoted inside of a legal decision (besides Most likely for the educational writings of prominent judges like Coke and Blackstone).
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is easy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's got attained such stage. Read more
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a important resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law calls for that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Any court might search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be a single or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority click here entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.